Before diving into deep you have to know what are those things so Lumen is a microservice and Laravel is a full-stack framework.
Lumen: It is a micro-framework created by Taylor Otwell, Lumen is a lighter, leaner, smaller, and faster complete web application framework. Lumen framework is faster and lighter compare to Laravel it has a huge community. It has just less configuration and different parameters.
Laravel: It is a web application framework created by Taylor Otwell in 2011 and like all other modern frameworks, it also follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern. Laravel values Elegance, Simplicity, and Readability, and if one talks of building applications with PHP frameworks, Laravel is second to none.
Similarities between Laravel and Lumen:
| Laravel | Lumen |
|---|---|
| Laravel was licensed under the MIT license. | Lumen was also licensed under an MIT license. |
| Laravel used its own syntaxes. | Lumen used Laravels’ syntaxes and easily can be upgraded into laravel. |
| Laravel supported third-party tools. | Lumen also supported third-party tools but in a lesser amount. |
| Laravel is developed by Taylor Otwell. | Lumen is also developed by Taylor Otwell. |
Differences between Laravel and Lumen:
| Laravel | Lumen |
|---|---|
| It was developed in 2011 by Taylor Otwell. | It was introduced in 2015. |
| Laravel has good documentation to work on and kick offMVC-based a new project. | Lumen has no clear documentation but is easy to use compared to Laravel. |
| Laravel is an MVC based full-stack web application framework that supports a lot of third-party tools like Spatie, Entrust, Socialite, and many more tools and frameworks. | Lumen is a micro framework, used to develop micro-services and API development at high speed and in less time. |
| Laravel performance is very good with SQL queries compared to Lumen. It can easily tuning their database from the application level | Lumen declines SQL queries and cant perform tuning on databases, less featured compared to Laravel. |
| Laravel is better for building RESTful APIs. | Lumen is better for building high-performing micro framework API. |
| Laravel can handle event queuing and has a powerful template. | Lumen can’t handle the event queuing and don’t have any powerful template either. |
| Laravel has Symfony framework that can be used to create Symfony components. | Lumen don’t have Symfony framework so can’t create Symfony components. |
| Laravel has its own command line interface. | Lumen is a feature-rich micro-framework. |
| It handles less requests per second. | It handles more requests per second as compared with Laravel. |
| It is a PHP-based framework. | It is the lighter version of Laravel only. |
| It is slow in terms of speed. | It is fast and the performance time is also good. |
| Response Time is high for Laravel. | Response time is less for Lumen as compared to Laravel. |
| It can be easily integrated with tools. | There are less number of integration facilities provided in Lumen than in other tools. |
Conclusion: Both Laravel and Lumen perform well for modern mobile, and web applications. Laravel is preferable because of its large community and if you want to create RESTful APIs isLaravel is more effective.
