Discounted Cumulative Gain
Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG) is the metric of measuring ranking quality. It is mostly used in information retrieval problems such as measuring the effectiveness of the search engine algorithm by ranking the articles it displays according to their relevance in terms of the search keyword.
Let’s consider that a search engine that outputs 5 documents named ( D1, D2, D3, D4, D5) are output in that order. We need to define the relevance scale (0-3) where:
- 0 : not relevant
- 1-2 : somewhat relevant
- 3 : completely relevant
Suppose these documents have relevance scores:
- D1 : 3
- D2 : 2
- D3 : 0
- D4 : 0
- D5 : 1
The Cumulative Gain is the sum of these relevance scores and can be calculated as:
The discounted cumulative gain can be calculated by the formula:
Therefore the discounted cumulative gain of above example is:
Now we need to arrange these articles in descending order by rankings and calculate DCG to get the Ideal Discounted Cumulative Gain (IDCG) ranking.
Now, we calculate our Normalized DCG using the following formula :
Code : Python program for Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain
Python3
# import required package from sklearn.metrics import ndcg_score, dcg_score import numpy as np # Relevance scores in Ideal order true_relevance = np.asarray([[ 3 , 2 , 1 , 0 , 0 ]]) # Relevance scores in output order relevance_score = np.asarray([[ 3 , 2 , 0 , 0 , 1 ]]) # DCG score dcg = dcg_score(true_relevance, relevance_score) print ( "DCG score : " , dcg) # IDCG score idcg = dcg_score(true_relevance, true_relevance) print ( "IDCG score : " , idcg) # Normalized DCG score ndcg = dcg / idcg print ( "nDCG score : " , ndcg) # or we can use the scikit-learn ndcg_score package print ( "nDCG score (from function) : " , ndcg_score( true_relevance, relevance_score)) |
Output:
DCG score : 4.670624189796882 IDCG score : 4.761859507142915 nDCG score : 0.980840401274087 nDCG score (from function) : 0.980840401274087
Limitations of Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG):
- NDCG metrics does not penalize the bad documents outputs. For Example: [3] and [3, 0, 0] has same NDCG but in second out there are two irrelevant documents.
- Because no specific standard defined for the number of output documents. DCG does not seem to deal with missing any relevant document in the output. For example, two outputs [3, 3, 3] and [3, 3, 3, 3] of similar input are considered equally good. For output-1 the DCG3 is calculated but for output-2 the DCG4 is calculated.
References:
- DCG Wikipedia article
- Jarvelin, K., & Kekalainen, J. (2002). Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 20(4), 422-446.